Premium
Nondestructive quantitative determination of docosahexaenoic acid and n−3 fatty acids in fish oils by high‐resolution 1 H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy
Author(s) -
Igarashi Tomoji,
Aursand Marit,
Hirata Yoshiaki,
Gribbestad Ingrid S.,
Wada Shun,
aka Michio
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
journal of the american oil chemists' society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.512
H-Index - 117
eISSN - 1558-9331
pISSN - 0003-021X
DOI - 10.1007/s11746-000-0119-0
Subject(s) - docosahexaenoic acid , fish oil , chemistry , fatty acid , polyunsaturated fatty acid , bonito , eicosapentaenoic acid , proton nmr , chromatography , nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy , tuna , analytical chemistry (journal) , fish <actinopterygii> , organic chemistry , biology , fishery
Abstract By using a 500 MHz proton nuclear magnetic resonance ( 1 H NMR) spectrometer we have developed a quantitative method for determining the contents of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in fish oils (mg/g), the molar proportions (mol%) of DHA to all other fatty acids composing the fish oils, and the molar proportions of total n‐3 fatty acids to all other non‐n‐3 fatty acids in the fish oils. After examining the suitability of ethylene glycol dimethyl ether (EGDM), methanol, and 1,4‐dioxane as internal standards, experimental conditions were optimized by mainly using EGDM as an internal standard. By setting the pulse repetition time at 30 s, five times longer than the longest T 1 of the 1 H NMR signals of fish oils, good reproductibility of data and analytical times less than 10 min were achieved. The use of the internal standard also allowed us to quantify DHA on a weight basis (mg/g). Verification of the method was carried out in an interlaboratory study between Japan and Norway on bonito, tuna, and salmon oils. The relative errors in the 1 H NMR data between Japan and Norway were 0.57–5.29% for quantification of DHA, 0.7–2.09% for the molar proportion of DHA, and 0.1–1.41% for the molar proportion of total n‐3 fatty acids. Good agreement was observed between the 1 H NMR data and those obtained by gas chromatography (GC). The sample preparation before 1 H NMR measurements required only two steps: sample weighing and preparation of an internal standard solution. Based on the high reproducibility, simplicity of the procedure, and clarity of principle, the proposed 1 H NMR method was judged to be a promising alternative to the GC method in quantification of DHA and n‐3 fatty acids in fish oils.