Open AccessEnvironmental and biological monitoring of occupational formaldehyde exposure resulting from the use of products for hair straightening
Author(s) -
Giovana Piva Peteffi,
Marina Venzon Antunes,
Caroline Carrer,
Luiz Felipe Valandro,
Sílvia Reis Santos,
Jéssica Glaeser,
Larissa Mattos,
Luciano Basso da Silva,
Rafael Linden
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
environmental science and pollution research international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.845
H-Index - 113
eISSN - 1614-7499
pISSN - 0944-1344
DOI - 10.1007/s11356-015-5343-4
Subject(s) - micronucleus test , genotoxicity , comet assay , formaldehyde , buccal swab , hair dyes , chemistry , toxicology , medicine , dna damage , biology , toxicity , microbiology and biotechnology , dyeing , dna , biochemistry , organic chemistry
The evaluation of formaldehyde (FD) exposure in beauty salons, due to the use of hair straightening products, and its relation with genotoxicity biomarkers was performed in this study. Regardless of official recommendations, the inappropriate use of homemade hair creams has became a popular practice in Brazil, and high formaldehyde content in the "progressive straightening" creams can contain mutagens that could increase the incidence of neoplasia in those people who use them. Damage to DNA was assessed by conducting a micronuclei test (MNT) on buccal cells and the comet assay on heparinized venous blood samples. A total of 50 volunteers were recruited at six different beauty salons (labeled A to F). At two salons that used products that did not contain FD (salons D and E), environmental FD concentrations were 0.04 and 0.02 ppm. In contrast, the products used at salons A, B, C, and F contained 5.7, 2.61, 5.9, and 5.79% of FD, and these salons had environmental FD concentrations of 0.07, 0.14, 0.16, and 0.14 ppm, respectively. Comparison of the beauty salon workers from each of the six beauty salons revealed significant differences in urinary formic acid (FA) concentration before exposure (p = 0.016), urinary FA after exposure (p = 0.004), variation in FA concentration before and after exposure (p = 0.018), environmental FD concentration (p < 0.001), cytogenetic damage detected by the comet assay according to both damage index (p < 0.001) and frequency of damage (p < 0.001), and for karyorrhexis only according to the MNT (p = 0.001).