Premium
Performance of two alpine plant species along environmental gradients in an alpine meadow ecosystem in central Tibet
Author(s) -
Dorji Tsechoe,
Moe Stein R.,
Klein Julia A.,
Wang Shiping,
Totland Ørjan
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
ecological research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.628
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1440-1703
pISSN - 0912-3814
DOI - 10.1007/s11284-016-1350-2
Subject(s) - abiotic component , species richness , ecology , abundance (ecology) , ecosystem , biology , herbivore , biotic component
Understanding how biotic interactions and abiotic conditions affect plant performance is important for predicting changes in ecosystem function and services in variable environments. We tested how performances of Astragalus rigidulus and Potentilla fruticosa change along gradients of biotic interactions (represented by plant species richness, abundance of the dominant plant species Kobresia pygmaea , and herbivory intensity) and abiotic conditions (represented by elevation, aspect, and slope steepness) across a semi‐arid landscape in central Tibet. Redundancy analyses showed that the biotic variables explained 30 and 39 % of the variation in overall performance of A. rigidulus ( P = 0.03) and P. fruticosa ( P = 0.01), respectively. Abiotic variables did not contribute significantly to variation among A. rigidulus populations. Plant size decreased with species richness in both species and was larger on south‐ rather than north‐facing slopes. Reproductive effort for both species was significantly negatively related to the abundance of K. pygmaea and both species had larger reproductive effort on south‐ rather than north‐ and west‐facing slopes. The proportion of biomass allocated to sexual reproduction in P. fruticosa was negatively correlated with K. pygmaea abundance and herbivory intensity. The population density of P. fruticosa was positively related to elevation, species richness, and K. pygmaea abundance. We conclude that plant performance at a local scale was more strongly related to biotic than abiotic conditions, but different components of plant performance responded differently to predictor variables and the responses were species‐specific. These findings have important implications for rangeland management under changing environmental conditions.