Premium
Community‐dependent foraging habits of flower visitors: cascading indirect interactions among five bumble bee species
Author(s) -
Ishii Hiroshi S.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
ecological research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.628
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1440-1703
pISSN - 0912-3814
DOI - 10.1007/s11284-013-1051-z
Subject(s) - nectar , foraging , biology , interspecific competition , trifolium repens , context (archaeology) , botany , ecology , pollen , paleontology
Despite the ubiquity and the importance of interspecific interactions among flower visitors, few studies have examined their effects on the realized feeding niches of visitor species in a community context. To evaluate the community‐wide effects of interactions among flower visitors, I have examined changes in the flower utilization patterns of each visitor species at several sites where the component of the visitor's community differed. Specifically, I compared the flower preferences and foraging habits (legitimate foraging vs. primary nectar robbing vs. secondary nectar robbing) of five bumble bee species in flower patches consisting of Trifolium pratense L. (red clover) and T. repens L. (white clover) on Hokkaido Island, Japan. I also examined the nectar production and standing crops of each flower species to evaluate the exploitation competition based on nectar. The bumble bee species exhibited different flower utilization patterns among sites. At sites where the long‐tongued Bombus diversus tersatus was common and the exotic short‐tongued B. terrestris was rare, B. diversus tersatus visited red clover (long‐tubed flowers) exclusively, whereas medium‐tongued B. pseudobaicalensis and short‐tongued B. hypocrita sapporoensis and B. hypnorum koropokkrus preferentially visited white clover (short‐tubed flowers). Conversely, at sites where the long‐tongued bee was rare, four other species frequently visited red clover in different modes: B. pseudobaicalensis visited legitimately, B. hypocrita sapporoensis and B. terrestris visited as primary nectar robbers, and B. hypnorum koropokkrus visited as a secondary nectar robber. The presence or absence of resource exploitation by the long‐tongued species and the interaction between primary and secondary nectar robbers via robbing holes was the major ecological sources of these differences. Diverse effects of interactions among flower visitors played important roles in shaping pattern of plant and flower visitor interactions.