z-logo
Premium
Measurement of net ecosystem production and ecosystem respiration in a Zoysia japonica grassland, central Japan, by the chamber method
Author(s) -
Dhital Deepa,
Muraoka Hiroyuki,
Yashiro Yuichiro,
Shizu Yoko,
Koizumi Hiroshi
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
ecological research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.628
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1440-1703
pISSN - 0912-3814
DOI - 10.1007/s11284-009-0678-2
Subject(s) - perennial plant , growing season , biomass (ecology) , ecosystem , zoysia japonica , primary production , environmental science , leaf area index , soil respiration , grassland , agronomy , ecosystem respiration , respiration , vegetation (pathology) , zoology , ecology , botany , biology , medicine , pathology
Measuring light, temperature, soil moisture, and growth provides a better understanding of net ecosystem production (NEP), ecosystem respiration ( R eco ), and their response functions. Here, we studied the variations in NEP and R eco in a grassland dominated by a perennial warm‐season C 4 grass, Zoysia japonica . We used the chamber method to measure NEP and R eco from August to September 2007. Biomass and leaf area index (LAI) were also measured to observe their effects on NEP and R eco . Diurnal variations in NEP and R eco were predicted well by light intensity (PPFD) and by soil temperature, respectively. Maximum NEP (NEP max ) values on days of year 221, 233, 247, and 262, were 2.44, 2.55, 3.90, and 4.17 μmol m −2 s −1 , respectively. Throughout the growing period, the apparent quantum yield ( α ) increased with increasing NEP max that ranged from 0.0154 to 0.0515, and NEP responded to the soil temperature changes by 44% and R eco changes by 48%, and R eco responded from 88 to 94% with the soil temperature diurnally. NEP's light response and R eco 's temperature response were affected by soil water content; more than 27% of the variation in NEP and 67% of the variation in R eco could be explained by this parameter. NEP was strongly correlated with biomass and LAI, but R eco was not, because environmental variables affected R eco more strongly than growth parameters. Using the light response of NEP, the temperature response of R eco , and meteorological data, daily NEP and R eco were estimated at 0.67, 0.81, 1.17, and 1.56 g C m −2 , and at 2.88, 2.50, 3.51, and 3.04 g C m −2 , respectively, on days of year 221, 233, 247, and 262. The corresponding daily gross primary production (NEP + R eco ) was 3.5, 3.3, 4.6, and 4.6 g C m −2 .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom