z-logo
Premium
Factors affecting egg predation in Black‐tailed Gulls
Author(s) -
Kazama Kentaro
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
ecological research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.628
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1440-1703
pISSN - 0912-3814
DOI - 10.1007/s11284-006-0064-2
Subject(s) - nest (protein structural motif) , predation , ecology , biology , accipitridae , vegetation (pathology) , nesting season , medicine , biochemistry , pathology
In colonial seabirds, nesting density, egg‐laying date and nest microhabitat affect the probability of eggs being taken by avian predators. Jungle Crows ( Corvus macrorhynchos ) are dominant predators of eggs of Black‐tailed Gulls ( Larus crassirostris ). Factors affecting the probability of gulls allowing the crows to attack their nests or depredate their eggs and the probability of eggs being taken were studied by direct observation and egg census, respectively. The effect of vegetation heights, position in the colony, egg‐laying date and neighbour nests on the probability of eggs being taken were examined at multiple spatial scales. Gull nests were depredated more easily by larger groups of crows. Nests in peripheral areas (<4 m from the edge of the colony) were also depredated more easily by the crows walking on the ground. Although the nests where eggs were laid early in the season were depredated more frequently, such nests highly synchronised in egg laying within a <2‐m radius were less likely to be depredated than less‐synchronised nests. The nests in tall vegetation were less likely to be depredated though those having neighbour nests in tall vegetation were not. The number of neighbour nests did not affect the probability of eggs being taken. Antipredation effects of nesting microhabitats vary with spatial scales at which the crows search and attack the nests of gulls.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here