Feasibility of Conducting a Trial Assessing Benefits and Risks of Planned Caesarean Section Versus Planned Vaginal Birth: A Cross-Sectional Study | Zendy

Melissa Amyx | Zendy; Fernando Althabe | Zendy; Julie Rivo | Zendy; Verónica Pingray | Zendy; Nicole Minckas | Zendy; María Belizán | Zendy; Luz Gibbons | Zendy; Gerardo T. Murga | Zendy; Angel Fiorillo | Zendy; Julio D. Malamud | Zendy; Roberto Casale | Zendy; Gabriela Cormick | Zendy; José M. Belizán | Zendy

Open Access

Feasibility of Conducting a Trial Assessing Benefits and Risks of Planned Caesarean Section Versus Planned Vaginal Birth: A Cross-Sectional Study

Author(s) -

Melissa Amyx,

Fernando Althabe,

Julie Rivo,

Verónica Pingray,

Nicole Minckas,

María Belizán,

Luz Gibbons,

Gerardo T. Murga,

Angel Fiorillo,

Julio D. Malamud,

Roberto Casale,

Gabriela Cormick,

José M. Belizán

Publication year - 2021

Publication title -

maternal and child health journal

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 1

H-Index - 85

eISSN - 1573-6628

pISSN - 1092-7875

DOI - 10.1007/s10995-020-03073-4

Subject(s) - medicine , randomized controlled trial , caesarean section , informed consent , cross sectional study , randomization , population , vaginal delivery , obstetrics , family medicine , gynecology , pregnancy , alternative medicine , environmental health , surgery , genetics , pathology , biology

Though interest is growing for trials comparing planned delivery mode (vaginal delivery [VD]; cesarean section [CS]) in low-risk nulliparous women, appropriate study design is unclear. Our objective was to assess feasibility of three designs (preference trial [PCT], randomized controlled trial [RCT], partially randomized patient preference trial [PRPPT]) for a trial comparing planned delivery mode in low-risk women.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research