Premium
Commentary: How Individual and Profession‐level Factors Influence Discussion of Disability in Prenatal Genetic Counseling
Author(s) -
Hodgson Jan,
Weil Jon
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of genetic counseling
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.867
H-Index - 52
eISSN - 1573-3599
pISSN - 1059-7700
DOI - 10.1007/s10897-011-9416-3
Subject(s) - genetic counseling , psychology , medicine , service (business) , genetic testing , clinical psychology , family medicine , genetics , economy , economics , biology
Hodgson and Weil ( Journal of Genetic Counseling ,2011) reports on two interactive workshops in which genetic counselors identified a broad set of counseling issues that may be impediments to promoting an adequate discussion of disability in prenatal genetic counseling. The present commentary discusses two factors that we infer underlie these counseling issues. First, countertransference concerning disability, which is normal and expected, may influence genetic counselors’ decisions about raising and exploring the complex topic of disability in prenatal genetic counseling. Second, the limited involvement of the profession of genetic counseling in the complex social and ethical issues of disability provide little guidance to the individual genetic counselor with respect to discussing disability in prenatal diagnosis counseling. We suggest both factors must be acknowledged and addressed in order to adequately implement the recommendations presented in Hodgson and Weil ( Journal of Genetic Counseling ,2011) as well as other efforts to increase discussion of disability in prenatal diagnosis counseling in the service of informed decision making.