z-logo
Premium
Genetic Testing Likelihood: The Impact of Abortion Views and Quality of Life Information on Women's Decisions
Author(s) -
Wilson Jessica L.,
Ferguson Gail M.,
Thorn Judith M.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
journal of genetic counseling
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.867
H-Index - 52
eISSN - 1573-3599
pISSN - 1059-7700
DOI - 10.1007/s10897-010-9335-8
Subject(s) - abortion , situational ethics , medicine , genetic counseling , genetic testing , quality of life (healthcare) , clinical psychology , family medicine , demography , psychology , pregnancy , social psychology , nursing , genetics , sociology , biology
Little is known about factors predicting the likelihood of choosing genetic testing in college aged women versus older women, including knowledge of quality of life (QOL) associated with a disorder. Using vignettes with female college students (Experiment 1: n  = 257, mean age = 19.70 yrs) and female faculty/staff/alumni (Experiment 2: n nulliparous  = 83, mean age = 30.20 yrs; n mothers  = 53, mean age = 33.77 yrs), we examined the contribution of multiple factors to predicting genetic testing likelihood for cystic fibrosis. We investigated malleable situational factors (style of genetic risk presentation and providing QOL information including physical and social aspects) and stable dispositional factors (abortion views). Parity (i.e., prior births) was more influential in women's genetic testing likelihood than was age. Greater acceptability of abortion for oneself and self‐assessed knowledge following QOL information were predictors of higher testing likelihood for college students. Greater acceptability of abortion for another person was a predictor for nulliparous women. Abortion views moderated the effect of predictors for nulliparous women and mothers. Findings encourage genetic counselors to utilize QOL information to promote informed decision making through genetic testing.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here