Premium
Re‐conceptualizing Risk in Genetic Counseling: Implications for Clinical Practice
Author(s) -
Austin Jehannine C.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
journal of genetic counseling
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.867
H-Index - 52
eISSN - 1573-3599
pISSN - 1059-7700
DOI - 10.1007/s10897-010-9279-z
Subject(s) - genetic counseling , risk communication , recall , psychology , perception , risk perception , process (computing) , public health , applied psychology , clinical psychology , medicine , risk analysis (engineering) , cognitive psychology , computer science , nursing , genetics , biology , neuroscience , operating system
Risk communication is an important component of genetic counseling. However, many authors have noted that after genetic counseling, subjective risk frequently does not match the objective risk provided by the counselor. This inevitably leads to the conclusion that the risk communication process was not “effective”. There has been much discussion about how this problem can be better addressed, such that our clients recall numeric risks more accurately after genetic counseling. This article draws on the risk and probability literature from other fields (including psychology, economics, philosophy and climate change) to deconstruct the concepts of “risk” and risk perception to attempt to expand upon and develop thought and discussion about and investigation of the risk communication process in genetic counseling.