Open AccessPeer Victimization and Selective Attention in Adolescence: Evidence from a Monozygotic Twin Difference Design
Author(s) -
Ian C. Carroll,
Elizabeth M. Planalp,
Carol A. Van Hulle,
H. Hill Goldsmith
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of abnormal child psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.706
H-Index - 142
eISSN - 1573-2835
pISSN - 0091-0627
DOI - 10.1007/s10802-019-00516-7
Subject(s) - psychology , peer victimization , developmental psychology , monozygotic twin , human factors and ergonomics , confounding , poison control , injury prevention , cognition , task (project management) , environmental health , medicine , psychiatry , pathology , biology , genetics , management , economics
Peer victimization impacts 13% of adolescents worldwide (Currie et al. 2012). Despite its prevalence and associated adverse outcomes, global cognitive processes that could be affected by peer victimization have not been thoroughly investigated. Using a monozygotic (MZ) twin difference design that rigorously controls for the influence of genetic and familial level confounders, we examined the relation between peer victimization exposure and selective attention processes during an affective go/no go task. Twins who experienced more severe peer victimization were biased towards detecting goal relevant stimuli during the task. Our findings suggest an environmentally salient relation between peer victimization and goal oriented selective attention. Future work should investigate how this process might serve to enhance or buffer risk of peer victimization exposure for developing later adverse outcomes.