Open AccessMeasuring Antiretroviral Adherence Among Young People Living with HIV: Observations from a Real-Time Monitoring Device Versus Self-report
Author(s) -
Lacey Craker,
Nicholas Tarantino,
Laura Whiteley,
Larry K. Brown
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
aids and behavior
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.994
H-Index - 106
eISSN - 1573-3254
pISSN - 1090-7165
DOI - 10.1007/s10461-019-02448-1
Subject(s) - health psychology , viral load , medicine , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) , context (archaeology) , public health , antiretroviral therapy , young adult , linear regression , demography , immunology , biology , statistics , paleontology , nursing , sociology , mathematics
This report compares self-report (SR) antiretroviral (ARV) adherence data to adherence data collected via Wisepill, a real-time electronic monitoring (EM) device, among young people living with HIV (YPLH) in the southern United States. Participants (n = 66; ages 16 to 26) were followed for 14 weeks. Descriptive analyses were used to compare SR to EM data. Correlations and a linear regression were conducted to explore factors possibly associated with SR-EM discrepancies. We also examined associations between various levels of SR and EM adherence and viral suppression/non-suppression at 14 weeks. Rates of SR adherence were maintained between 87% and 92% while rates of EM adherence declined from 64% to 34%. YPLH who were ARV-experienced, had lower treatment motivation, and reported more frequent recent marijuana use, had a greater discrepancy between their SR and EM adherence levels compared to other YPLH. Higher rates of SR and EM adherence were independently associated with a decline in viral load. A sensitivity analysis also revealed that SR adherence was a better predictor of viral non-suppression, whereas EM adherence was a better predictor of viral suppression. These measurement approaches are discussed in the context of providing clinical care to YPLH.