
Effect of atmospheric gases, surface albedo and cloud overlap on the absorbed solar radiation
Author(s) -
A. K. Sinha
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
annales geophysicae
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.522
H-Index - 93
eISSN - 1432-0576
pISSN - 0992-7689
DOI - 10.1007/s00585-996-0329-7
Subject(s) - albedo (alchemy) , atmospheric sciences , cloud albedo , atmosphere (unit) , cloud fraction , radiative transfer , environmental science , absorption (acoustics) , anomaly (physics) , cloud forcing , cloud cover , physics , meteorology , cloud computing , radiative forcing , optics , aerosol , art , performance art , computer science , art history , condensed matter physics , operating system
Recent studies have provided new evidencethat models may systematically underestimate cloud solar absorption compared toobservations. This study extends previous work on this "absorptionanomaly' by using observational data together with solar radiative transferparameterisations to calculate fs (the ratio of surface andtop of the atmosphere net cloud forcings) and its latitudinal variation for arange of cloud types. Principally, it is found that (a) the zonal mean behaviourof fs varies substantially with cloud type, with the highestvalues obtained for low clouds; (b) gaseous absorption and scattering canradically alter the pattern of the variation of fs withlatitude, but gaseous effects cannot in general raise fs tothe level of around 1.5 as recently determined; (c) the importance of thegaseous contribution to the atmospheric ASR is such that whilst fsrises with surface albedo, the net cloud contribution to the atmospheric ASRfalls; (d) the assumed form of the degree of cloud overlap in the model cansubstantially affect the cloud contribution to the atmospheric ASR whilstleaving the parameter fs largely unaffected; (e) even largeuncertainties in the observed optical depths alone cannot account fordiscrepancies apparent between modelled and newly observed cloud solarabsorption. It is concluded that the main source of the anomaly may derive fromthe considerable uncertainties regarding impure droplet microphysics ratherthan, or together with, uncertainties in macroscopic quantities. Further,variable surface albedos and gaseous effects may limit the use ofcontemporaneous satellite and ground-based measurements to infer the cloud solarabsorption from the parameter fs