z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Lessons from the NIST micronutrients quality assurance program for vitamin C, 1993 to 2015: sample stability, assay reproducibility, and use of controls to improve comparability
Author(s) -
David L. Duewer,
Jeffrey J. Thomas,
Katherine E. Sharpless,
Sam A. Margolis
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
analytical and bioanalytical chemistry/analytical and bioanalytical chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.86
H-Index - 166
eISSN - 1618-2650
pISSN - 1618-2642
DOI - 10.1007/s00216-020-03021-9
Subject(s) - reproducibility , ascorbic acid , repeatability , comparability , nist , coefficient of variation , normalization (sociology) , chemistry , chromatography , micronutrient , quality assurance , analytical chemistry (journal) , mathematics , external quality assessment , medicine , food science , computer science , pathology , organic chemistry , combinatorics , sociology , natural language processing , anthropology
Vitamin C is a necessary micronutrient that is involved in many biological processes. In preserved human plasma and serum, vitamin C is most meaningfully analyzed as total ascorbic acid (TAA). From 1993 through 2015, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) coordinated 40 interlaboratory studies (ILS) devoted to improving the between-participant comparability of TAA measurements. The results from these ILS demonstrate that the concentration of TAA ([TAA]) is stable for at least 20 years in serum diluted 1 + 1 (volume fraction) with 10% mass concentration aqueous metaphosphoric acid (MPA) and stored at -80 °C. The between-participant relative reproducibility precision, expressed as a coefficient of variation (CV), improved from over 16% to under 9% over the course of the studies. Normalization of test samples (i.e., ex post-facto recalibrating the as-submitted results) using participant-prepared serum-free calibration solutions did not improve reproducibility. Normalization to one control sample having a similar serum-based matrix as the test samples improved the CV to 7%; normalization to two such controls reduced the CV to 4%. Multicenter studies that require the highest degree of measurement comparability among the participants should consider calibrating with materials that have a serum-based matrix as similar as possible to that of the samples of interest.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here