Premium
Indications for hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma — What stage of the disease is the best indication for surgery?
Author(s) -
Sasaki Yo,
Imaoka Shingi,
Nakano Hiroshi,
Ishikawa Osamu,
Ohigashi Hiroaki,
Yasuda Takushi,
Nakamori Shoji,
Kameyama Masao,
Hiratsuka Masahiro,
Kabuto Toshiyuki,
Furukawa Hiroshi,
Kasugai Hiroshi,
Inoue Atsuo,
Fujita Makoto,
Inoue Etsuo
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
journal of hepato‐biliary‐pancreatic surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.63
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1868-6982
pISSN - 0944-1166
DOI - 10.1007/pl00009944
Subject(s) - hepatocellular carcinoma , hepatectomy , stage (stratigraphy) , medicine , surgery , general surgery , resection , biology , paleontology
To determine the clinical and tumor stage of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that is the best indication for surgery, the postoperative long‐term outcomes of patients who underwent hepatic resection were examined retrospectively. Of 975 patients with HCC who underwent regional therapy, 384 patients (39%) received hepatic resection (HR), 534 (55%) had transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), and the remaining 57 (6%) received percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) into the tumor. The criteria defined by liver Cancer Study Group of Japan was used for staging and liver functional reserve (i.e., clinical staging). 1 In the 133 patients with stage I HCC, there were no significant differences among the survivals of the HR, TACE, and PEI groups. In the 314 patients with stage II HCC, the 5‐ and 7‐year survival rates were 51% and 46% in the HR group, 23% and 10% in the TACE group, and 0% and 0% in the PEI group. The survival of the HR group was significantly better than the survivals of the TACE and PEI groups ( P < 0.001). The 5‐ and 10‐year survivals of the stage II HCC patients who had HR were 64% and 47% in the clinical stage I (i.e., good liver function) group, significantly better than the 5; and 10‐year survivals (32% and 23%) in the clinical stage II (i.e., bad liver function) group ( P < 0.0001). Patients with good liver function in stage II are expected to have better survival and are considered to be the most suitable for HR.