A comparative study of external and endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy — a preliminary report | Zendy

Suresh S. David | Zendy; Ravish Sanghi Raju | Zendy; Anand Job | Zendy; J L Richard | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

A comparative study of external and endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy — a preliminary report

Author(s) -

Suresh S. David,

Ravish Sanghi Raju,

Anand Job,

J L Richard

Publication year - 1999

Publication title -

indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.229

H-Index - 22

eISSN - 2231-3796

pISSN - 0973-7707

DOI - 10.1007/bf02996430

Subject(s) - medicine , dacryocystorhinostomy , otorhinolaryngology , surgery , head and neck surgery , endoscopic endonasal surgery , skull

This prospective study was done ta compare the results of external and endonasal dacryocys-torhinostomy (DCR). 6 patients were studied under each group. Success rate for external DCR was 93.3% and endonasal was DCR 100%. The technique, merits and disadvantages of both the procedures are discussed as well as the advantages of endonasal DCR highlighted.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research