Premium
Palladium‐ catalyzed hydrogenation of soybean oil
Author(s) -
Ahmad M. M.,
Priestley T. M.,
Winterbottom J. M.
Publication year - 1979
Publication title -
journal of the american oil chemists' society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.512
H-Index - 117
eISSN - 1558-9331
pISSN - 0003-021X
DOI - 10.1007/bf02660237
Subject(s) - palladium , catalysis , nickel , methanation , chemistry , metal , inorganic chemistry , hydrogen , charcoal , organic chemistry
The hydrogenation of soybean oil has been studied using charcoal‐supported palladium catalysts at hydrogen pressures between ambient and 70 psig and at temperatures between 80 C and 160 C in three types of stirred reactor. The catalysts employed were 1‐10% w/w Pd supported on charcoal and represented differing metal placement on the support. The structure of the catalysts was confirmed by metal surface area measurements, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis (ESCA). Comparative studies also were carried out under similar conditions using samples of commercial nickel catalysts. Palladium catalysts with the metal placed on the exterior of the charcoal support were the most active and selective at ambient pressure, and although palladium catalysts with metal placed within the charcoal pore system became the most active at higher hydrogen pressures, only the former type of catalyst retained high selec‐tivity over the whole temperature and pressure range. Palladium catalysts gave rise to more trans‐ acids than nickel, particularly under conditions normally em‐ployed with the latter, but if diffusion limitation was avoided, especially at lower temperatures, palladium gave lower quantities of trans‐ acid than nickel. In addition, the selectivity of a well designed palladium catalyst was superior to that of nickel and its activity was 15‐20 times greater. It is concluded that if palladium is deposited on the exterior of the charcoal so that it is accessible to the triglyceride molecules, then its selectivity and activity is superior to that of nickel, even at low temperatures, at which nickel is inactive. This underlines the importance of choosing the correct preparative route to give optimum metal placement, and it is suggested that when previous studies have indicated that palladium is unselective for fat hardening, it is likely that the metal was not dispersed on the exterior surface of the support. Furthermore, whereas nickel is best used under diffusion‐controlled conditions because its selectivity is better in the latter situation palladium should be used under diffusion‐free conditions, which implies that very careful attention should be paid to the reactor design.