Premium
A comparison of nuclear magnetic resonance and dilatometry for estimating solids content of fats and shortenings
Author(s) -
Pohle W. D.,
Taylor J. R.,
Gregory R. L.
Publication year - 1965
Publication title -
journal of the american oil chemists' society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.512
H-Index - 117
eISSN - 1558-9331
pISSN - 0003-021X
DOI - 10.1007/bf02636912
Subject(s) - chemistry , total dissolved solids , analytical chemistry (journal) , nuclear magnetic resonance , materials science , chromatography , physics , environmental engineering , engineering
The percent solids values of fats and shortenings using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and solid fat index (SFI) have been compared. The samples used were: blends of hard fat and safflower oil, safflower oil hydrogenated to varying degrees, and different types of shortenings. This investigation demonstrated the empirical nature of the SFI technique and shows the nature of the deviations from the solids content determined by the NMR method. The magnitude of the deviation of SFI from the NMR solids content increased with the level of the solids. The SFI values and the NMR solids content were similar at the lower levels (SFI values of 10) but at the upper limit for the SFI method (SFI values of 50) the solids content by the NMR method can be 80% or more, a difference of 30 units. Although the determination of solids content by NMR is reliable, the relationship between SFI values and NMR values for different types of samples is so variable that the calculation of the SFI value from percent solids by NMR, or percent solids from SFI values from prediction equations is not very reliable. Since NMR measures the solids content more accurately than SFI and is applicable over the entire range of solids, 0 to 100%, it will be very useful in fat and oil research and control.