z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Aerodynamic characteristics of the Nijdam voice prosthesis in relation to tracheo-esophageal wall thickness
Author(s) -
Anne Fleur van Veenstra,
Frank J. A. van den Hoogen,
H.K. Schutte,
HF Nijdam,
J. J. Manni,
G.J. Verkerke
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
european archives of oto-rhino-laryngology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.849
H-Index - 71
eISSN - 1434-4726
pISSN - 0937-4477
DOI - 10.1007/bf02630747
Subject(s) - voice prosthesis , prosthesis , medicine , esophageal speech , prosthesis implantation , surgery , larynx , laryngectomy
Tracheo-esophageal speech using various prostheses is currently the most successful form of voice and speech rehabilitation for laryngectomies. Main inter-device differences are durability and trans-device pressure loss during speech. The valveless indwelling Nijdam voice prosthesis is a new voice prosthesis. A barrier mechanism is created by a combination of the esophageal mucosa and the umbrella-like "hat" of the prosthesis that covers the esophageal side of the tracheo-esophageal fistula. The Nijdam prosthesis can be used clinically for longer periods of time when compared to such other indwelling voice prostheses as the Provox prosthesis and the low-resistance Groningen prosthesis. However, transdevice pressure loss during speech has been unknown. Adjustment of the shft length of the Nijdam voice prosthesis to tracheo-esophageal wall thickness was expected to affect trans-device pressure loss during speech. We report the results of in vitro tests to quantify the effect of tracheo-esophageal wall thickness on trans-device pressure loss. In the present study pressure loss was measured at different air flow rates in relation to tracheo-esophageal wall thickness. Findings demonstrated that when shaft length of the Nijdam prosthesis corresponded exactly to tracheo-esophageal wall thickness, trans-device pressure loss was comparable to that of the Provox prosthesis. If a relatively shorter Nijdam prosthesis was chosen to prevent aspiration from occurring, the pressure loss across the prosthesis increased to that of the low-resistance Groningen prosthesis.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom