Premium
Carbonyls in oxidizing fat. VII. A comparison of methods of isolating monocarbonyl compounds
Author(s) -
Gaddis A. M.,
Ellis Rex,
Shamey Jennie,
Currie G. T.
Publication year - 1965
Publication title -
journal of the american oil chemists' society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.512
H-Index - 117
eISSN - 1558-9331
pISSN - 0003-021X
DOI - 10.1007/bf02541300
Subject(s) - autoxidation , oxidizing agent , chemistry , distillation , organic chemistry , isolation (microbiology) , vacuum distillation , biology , microbiology and biotechnology
Comparison of quantitative methods for the isolation of aldehydes from lard oxidized at 23C showed an extreme sensitivity of precursors to isolation conditions. Differences existed in the quantity and class compositions of the monocarbonyl compounds isolated. Acid conditions caused considerable breakdown of alkanal and alk‐2‐enal precursors. Steam distillation (100C) released alkanals, alk‐2‐enals, and alk‐2,4‐dienals. The mild Girard T method apparently produced a small amt of alk‐2‐enals from precursors, but except in the initial stages isolated the lowest amounts of aldehydes. Complete evaluation of the method for isolation of free aldehydes was not possible because alkanals were released from precursors during the vacuum distillation procedure (50C). The Schwartz (dilute phosphoric acid), Girard T, and vacuum distillation methods isolated similar amounts of alk‐2,4‐dienals. Curious changes in relationships, possibly indicative of oxidation stages, were observed as autoxidation progressed.