Premium
Influence of dietary fat composition on intestinal absorption in the rat
Author(s) -
Thomson A. B. R.,
Keelan M.,
Garg M. L.,
Clandinin M. T.
Publication year - 1989
Publication title -
lipids
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.601
H-Index - 120
eISSN - 1558-9307
pISSN - 0024-4201
DOI - 10.1007/bf02535128
Subject(s) - eicosapentaenoic acid , docosahexaenoic acid , tallow , food science , fatty acid , linolenic acid , chemistry , biochemistry , biology , polyunsaturated fatty acid , linoleic acid
Omega‐3 fatty acids influence the function of the intestinal brush border membrane. For example, the omega‐3 fatty acid eicosapentaenoic acid (20∶5ω3) has an antiabsorptive effect on jejunal uptake of glucose. This study was undertaken to determine whether the effect of feeding α‐linolenic acid (18∶3ω3) or EPA plus docosahexaenoic acid (22∶6ω3) on intestinal absorption of nutrients was influenced by the major source of dietary lipid, hydrogenated beef tallow or safflower oil. The in vitro intestinal uptake of glucose, fatty acids and cholesterol was examined in rats fed isocaloric diets for 2 weeks: beef tallow, beef tallow + linolenic acid, beef tallow + eicosapentaenoic acid/docosahexaenoic acid, safflower oil, safflower oil + linolenic acid, or safflower oil + eicosapentaenic acid/docosahexaenoic acid. Eicosapentaenoic acid/docosahexaenoic acid reduced jejunal uptake of 10 and 20 mM glucose only when fed with beef tallow, and not when fed with safflower oil. Linolenic acid had no effect on glucose uptake, regardless of whether it was fed with beef tallow or safflower oil. The jejunal uptake a long‐chain fatty acids (18∶0, 18∶2ω6, 18∶3ω3, 20∶4ω6, 20∶5ω3 and 22∶6ω3) and cholesterol was lower in salfflower oil than with beef tallow. When eicosapentaenoic acid/docosahexaenoic acid was given with beef tallow (but not with safflower oil), there was lower uptake of 18∶0, 20∶5ω3 and cholesterol. The demonstration of the inhibitory effect of linolenic acid or eicosapentaenoic acid/docosahexaenoic acid on cholesterol uptake required the feeding of a saturated fatty acid diet (beef tallow). These changes in uptake were not explained by differences in the animals’ food intake, body weight gain or intestinal weight. Feeding safflower oil was associated with an approximately 25% increase in the jejunal and ileal mucosal surface area, but this increase was prevented by combining linolenic acid or eicosapentaenoic acid/docosahexaenoic acid with safflower oil. Different inhibitory patterns were observed when mixtures of fatty acids were present together in the incubation medium, rather than in the diet: for example, when 18∶0 was in the incubation medium with 20∶4ω6, the uptake of 20∶4ω6 was reduced, whereas the uptake was unaffected by 18∶2ω6 or 20∶5ω3. Thus, (1) the inhibitory effect of eicosapentaenoic acid/docosahexaenoic acid on jejunal uptake of glucose, fatty acids and cholesterol was influenced by the major dietary lipid, saturated (beef tallow) or polyunsaturated fatty acid (safflower oil); and (2) different omega‐3 fatty acids (linolenic acid versus eicosapentaenoic acid/docosahexaenoic acid) have a variable influence on the intestinal absorption of nutrients.