z-logo
Premium
Evaluation of the rapid micromethod for ultracentrifugal separation of labeled plasma lipoproteins
Author(s) -
Shireman Rachel B.,
Williams Debbie
Publication year - 1983
Publication title -
lipids
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.601
H-Index - 120
eISSN - 1558-9307
pISSN - 0024-4201
DOI - 10.1007/bf02534675
Subject(s) - chemistry , chromatography , ultracentrifuge , very low density lipoprotein , fractionation , lipidology , lipoprotein , plasma lipoprotein , centrifugation , fraction (chemistry) , distribution (mathematics) , clinical chemistry , cholesterol , biochemistry , mathematical analysis , mathematics
The fractionations of plasma lipoproteins by 2 methods were compared to evaluate the rapid separation (Airfuge ® ) method for lipoprotein distribution studies. When [ 125 I] labeled very low density, low density, and high density lipoproteins (VLDL, LDL, HDL), were separately centrifuged in buffers at d=1.006, 1.06 or 1.2 g/ml by the conventional ultracentrifuge and the Airfuge ® , separations of the fractions in the Airfuge ® were incomplete at both 5 C and 24 C, especially at d=1.006. [ 3 H] Benzo (a)pyrene, when added to plasma, associates with the plasma proteins and lipoproteins, especially LDL. Compared to the standard techniques, the Airfuge ® method greatly overestimated its distribution into VLDL. The distribution of [ 3 H] vitamin D 3 into the VLDL plus LDL fraction was also overestimated by the Airfuge ® procedure. It is concluded that caution should be observed in quantitative studies of lipoproteins in the Airfuge ® . A careful comparison of the distribution into or fractionation of lipoproteins by the 2 methods should always precede any quantitative determinations involving the Airfuge ® .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom