z-logo
Premium
Effects of raw materials and preparation methods of catalysts on the selective hydrogenation of ethyl phenylacetate
Author(s) -
Ishii Kazuaki,
Mizukami Fujio,
Niwa Shuichi,
Toba Makoto,
Ushijima Hirobumi,
Sato Takami
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
journal of the american oil chemists' society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.512
H-Index - 117
eISSN - 1558-9331
pISSN - 0003-021X
DOI - 10.1007/bf02523920
Subject(s) - catalysis , ruthenium , tin , yield (engineering) , raw material , distilled water , chloride , chemistry , phenylacetate , selectivity , alkali metal , nuclear chemistry , inorganic chemistry , organic chemistry , materials science , metallurgy , chromatography , biochemistry
A ruthenium/tin/alumina catalyst was found to hydrogenate ethyl phenylacetate to 2‐phenylethanol selectively with a high yield. The optimum atomic ratio of ruthenium to tin was 1∶2, and the optimum metal content was about 5 and 11.75 wt% for ruthenium and tin, respectively. The raw materials of the catalyst had a significant effect on the conversion and selectivity in the catalytic hydrogenation. Chloride had a negative effect on catalytic activity. Washing the catalysts, which were prepared from chloride materials, with distilled water or alkali solution had a positive effect upon catalyst activity. The catalyst prepared from chloride‐free raw materials performed the best, and the impregnation catalyst has a higher yield than the solgel catalyst, suggesting that impregnation is a suitable procedure for this reaction.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom