Premium
Paths to community empowerment: Organizing at home
Author(s) -
Saegert Susan,
Winkel Gary
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
american journal of community psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.113
H-Index - 112
eISSN - 1573-2770
pISSN - 0091-0562
DOI - 10.1007/bf02506795
Subject(s) - empowerment , psychology , context (archaeology) , social psychology , quality of life (healthcare) , equity (law) , political science , economic growth , economics , geography , archaeology , law , psychotherapist
This study examines how low‐income minority communities build on their strengths to improve material conditions and how these actions lead to further empowerment at the individual and group level, and increase engagement with civic life. Based on earlier qualitative research, low‐income limited equity housing co‐ops were chosen as research. Using quantitative questionnaire data, a path model was tested in which variables were organized into four levels. Level One : Attributes of the person and the context were conceptualized as exogenous variables leading to activities first at the co‐op level. Level Two : co‐op activities were thought to affect living conditions in the building and evaluations of co‐op ownership, which comprised Level Three , quality of life in the building . All preceding levels were thought to influence empowerment , as measured at Level Four through an attitudinal measure of empowerment, and reported participation in civic activities in the broader community. The model, which emphasizes the collective and material nature of empowerment in addition to the psychological, seems justified by the data. It is especially significant that the aggregate measure of perceived participation of others predicted building quality, and that the aggregate measure of building quality went on to influence empowerment and voting behavior. Personal participation in building activities also proved a good predictor of empowerment, indicating that empowerment operates at both the individual and the group level. Furthermore, increased empowerment at the level of attitude did influence civic activities, in conjunction with personal characteristics and perceived neighborhood qualities. (Tests of causality in the opposite direction were not significant.) Our findings confirm the importance of all three components of empowerment, as articulated by Zimmerman and his colleagues (1992), that is, empowerment at the psychological, interactional, and behavioral level. It extends the conceptualization by introducing the group level of analysis.