Premium
A fitness function for optimal life history in relation to density effects, competition, predation and stability of the environment
Author(s) -
Satou Shintarou
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
ecological research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.628
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1440-1703
pISSN - 0912-3814
DOI - 10.1007/bf02346936
Subject(s) - carrying capacity , population , biology , density dependence , predation , mathematics , growth rate , ecology , statistics , demography , geometry , sociology
A fitness function (function maximized under natural selection) is studied in a population model in which the growth of a population is suppressed by crowding, density‐independent continuous mortality (by euryphagous predators) and periodic disturbances. The dynamics of the population density between occurrence of disturbance can be expressed as, dN/dt=(F(N/K)−D)N , where N is the population density, K is the carrying capacity, D is the density‐independent continuous mortality, and F is the growth regulation factor described as a function of crowding ( N/K ). The period of disturbance is S . The survival rate under disturbance is u . It is concluded that the fitness function is (approximately) a product of competitive ability ( C ), carrying capacity, and degree of saturation, and is given by CKF −1 ( D −(ln u )/ S ). The degree of saturation is the inverse function of regulation factor ( F ) at the death rate due to predators and disturbance. I assume a population in which density is regulated only through survival. In this case, a low survival rate at the critical age‐group means a high value of CKF −1 ( D −(ln u )/ S ). Therefore, the reciprocal of the density‐dependent survival rate at critical age‐group is a measure of the fitness function. Using this measure, I predict the optimal age (body size) at first reproduction of a species of salamander. I also found that fitness calculated from observed values of l(x) and m(x) includes a tautology. When the concept of fitness function is compared with the ESS method, the latter is more flexible. However, there is a possibility that an ESS is at the minimum of fitness function.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom