Premium
Endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones: Impact of recent technical advances
Author(s) -
Tanaka Masao,
Konomi Hiroyuki,
Matsunaga Hiroaki,
Yokohata Kazunori,
Utsunomiya Naruhiro,
Takeda Torahiko
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
journal of hepato‐biliary‐pancreatic surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.63
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1868-6982
pISSN - 0944-1166
DOI - 10.1007/bf01211338
Subject(s) - medicine , lithotripsy , pancreatitis , surgery , stent , acute pancreatitis , bile duct , incidence (geometry) , common bile duct , optics , physics
Technical improvements, such as mechanical lithotripsy, stenting or nasobiliary drainage, and wire‐guided cannulation, have reduced the risk of complications in endoscopic sphincterotomy. To determine the extent of this reduction in risk, we assessed the medical records of 1352 patients with common bile duct stones in whom the procedure was conducted. Complications examined were: acute cholangitis and pancreatitis. Stone clearance was achieved in 1256 patients (92.8%), with an overall morbidity rate of 7.7% and a mortality rate of 0.15%. One hundred and forty‐two patients had stones with a diameter greater than 20mm; 97 of these patients did not undergo lithotripsy. Cholangitis occurred in 10 of these 97 patients (10.3%), whereas, in the 45 patients who underwent lithotripsy, there were no cases of cholangitis ( P =0.02). Stone removal was not immediately accomplished or attempted in 396 patients. In 82 of these patients in whom a stent or a nasobiliary drain was placed in the common bile duct, the incidence of cholangitis was 1.2%, significantly less ( P =0.045) than the incidence of 6.4% in the other 314 patients given no stenting or nasobiliary drain. To overcome difficult cannulation, precut sphincterotomy was conducted in 134 patients and wireguided sphincterotomy, a recently introduced procedure, was conducted in 55 patients. When the precutting technique was used, the incidence of acute pancreatitis was significantly higher (8/134; 6.0%) than that in the patients in whom the standard procedure was conducted, i.e., neither the precut technique nor wire‐guided ES was used (23/1218; 1.9%) ( P =0.008). There were no cases of pancreatitis in the 55 patients in whom wire‐guided sphincterotomy was performed, although the difference was not statistically significant because of the small number of patients ( P =0.06). Based on these findings, we conclude that improved technologies have led to a significant reduction of complications in endoscopic sphincterotomy.