Premium
Effects of age on sperm quality metrics in endangered Mississippi gopher frogs ( Lithobates sevosus ) from captive populations used for controlled propagation and reintroduction efforts
Author(s) -
Watt Ashley M.,
MarcecGreaves Ruth,
Hinkson Kristin M.,
Poo Sinlan,
Roberts Beth,
Pitcher Trevor E.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
zoo biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.5
H-Index - 54
eISSN - 1098-2361
pISSN - 0733-3188
DOI - 10.1002/zoo.21594
Subject(s) - biology , endangered species , breed , sperm , captive breeding , zoology , longevity , sperm quality , lithobates , ecology , reproduction , sperm motility , amphibian , habitat , genetics
A decline in sperm quality with age is a common prediction of senescence‐based hypotheses and empirical studies. While widely studied across taxa, there is little known on the effect of ageing on sperm quality in amphibians, especially in captive populations used for controlled propagation and reintroduction efforts. Here, we investigated variation in sperm quality metrics (i.e., motility, concentration, and morphology) in the endangered Mississippi gopher frog ( Lithobates sevosus ) among males of three age categories using individuals from captive breeding populations housed at three different zoological institutions. Different aged males across the species expectant lifespan (1–9, 1–2, 3–4, and 8–9‐year‐old subcategories) were chosen in an attempt to identify an optimal breeding age relevant for captive breeding programs. Moreover, we explored and statistically controlled for potential differences in sperm quality which may be attributed to the type of induction hormones and source populations that differed among institutions. Results indicated that males of different ages did not differ in sperm motility or concentration. However, we did find that older males (8–9 years old) had significantly longer sperm than other age categories and younger males (1–2 years old) had significantly more atypical sperm than other age categories. Furthermore, we found no significant differences in any sperm quality metrics between the different induction hormones or source populations used at the different institutions. Within a captive breeding program, this information is especially valuable as our results indicate that males that have only recently sexually matured may not be ready to breed, while older males maintain sperm quality metrics presumably related to fertilization success.