z-logo
Premium
On Hybrid High Resolution Upwind Methods for Multicomponent Flows
Author(s) -
Ivings M. J.,
Causon D. M.,
Toro E. F.
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
zamm ‐ journal of applied mathematics and mechanics / zeitschrift für angewandte mathematik und mechanik
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.449
H-Index - 51
eISSN - 1521-4001
pISSN - 0044-2267
DOI - 10.1002/zamm.19970770904
Subject(s) - upwind scheme , mathematics , riemann problem , shock (circulatory) , piecewise linear function , flow (mathematics) , riemann solver , piecewise , roe solver , riemann hypothesis , shock wave , numerical analysis , flux limiter , scheme (mathematics) , mathematical optimization , mathematical analysis , mechanics , finite volume method , geometry , physics , discretization , medicine
Shock capturing numerical methods expressed in terms of conservative variables produce erroneous solutions when applied to multicomponent flows. Numerical schemes expressed in terms of primitive variables are able to provide accurate results for non‐shocked multicomponent flows. An assessment of four hybrid primitive‐conservative upwind schemes is presented for the solution of multicomponent flows involving strong shock waves. The schemes used are the MUSCL ‐Hancock scheme, the Weighted Average Flux scheme, and modified versions of the Generalised Riemann Problem, and Piecewise Linear Methods. These four hybrid schemes provide accurate solutions to such problems, and numerical experiments suggest that they converge. It is also shown that conservative methods may often provide satisfactory results when applied to multicomponent problems when the flow is dominated by strong shocks.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom