z-logo
Premium
1,1‐Carboboration of Dialkynyltin Compounds using Tri­organoboranes of Greatly Different Lewis Acid Strength. 1,4‐Stannabora‐cyclohexa‐2,5‐dienes and Characterization of Zwitterionic Intermediates
Author(s) -
Wrackmeyer Bernd,
Thoma Peter,
Marx Simone,
Glatz Germund,
Kempe Rhett
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
zeitschrift für anorganische und allgemeine chemie
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.354
H-Index - 66
eISSN - 1521-3749
pISSN - 0044-2313
DOI - 10.1002/zaac.201300007
Subject(s) - chemistry , reactivity (psychology) , intramolecular force , electrophile , lewis acids and bases , nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy , tin , stereochemistry , adduct , medicinal chemistry , catalysis , organic chemistry , medicine , alternative medicine , pathology
Abstract. Triorganoboranes B R 3 , Et‐9‐BBN, BPh 3 , and B(C 6 F 5 ) 3 , were compared in their reactivity towards various dialkynyl(diorgano)tin compounds ( R 1 2 Sn(C≡C– R 2 ) 2 with R 1 2 = –(CH 2 ) 5 –, R 2 = H ( a ), R 1 = n Bu, R 2 = H ( b ), R 1 = Ph, R 2 = H ( c ), R 1 = R 2 = n Bu ( d )). 1,1‐Carboboration took place readily in two consecutive steps (inter‐ and intramolecular), leading either to stannoles or to 1,4‐stannabora‐cyclohexa‐2,5‐dienes, or mixtures thereof. The weakest Lewis‐acidic triorganoboranes BEt 3 and Et‐9‐BBN afford selectively stannoles with diethynyltin compounds, whereas the strongly electrophilic B(C 6 F 5 ) 3 leads selectively to 1,4‐stannabora‐cyclohexa‐2,5‐dienes for all dialkynyltin compounds studied. In several cases, zwitterionic intermediates could be detected by multinuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy ( 1 H, 11 B, 13 C, and 119 Sn NMR), and the molecular structure of such an intermediate as well as that of the final product, an 1,4‐stannabora‐cyclohexa‐2,5‐diene, could be determined by X‐ray crystallography.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here