z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
P2Y receptors in bone
Author(s) -
Orriss Isabel R.,
Arnett Timothy R.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
wiley interdisciplinary reviews: membrane transport and signaling
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2190-4618
pISSN - 2190-460X
DOI - 10.1002/wmts.67
Subject(s) - p2y receptor , receptor , chemistry , osteocyte , microbiology and biotechnology , bone cell , bone remodeling , osteoblast , medicine , endocrinology , biochemistry , biology , purinergic receptor , in vitro
Bones are formed and remodeled by the coordinated actions of three key cell types. Osteoblasts, specialized connective tissue cells, deposit and then mineralize the collagenous bone matrix. Osteoclasts, which are derived from promonocytes, resorb mineralized matrix by excavating characteristic pits on bone surfaces. The third cell type, osteocytes, differentiates from osteoblasts that become trapped in bone matrix, forming a three‐dimensional network that is thought to detect deformations due to mechanical loading. This brief review summarizes what is known of the roles played by the G‐protein‐coupled P2Y receptors in modulating bone cell function. Current indications are that both osteoblasts and osteoclasts express P2Y 1 , P2Y 2 , P2Y 4 , P2Y 6 , and P2Y 12–14 receptors. The UTP/ADP‐sensitive P2Y 2 receptor, expression of which is highly upregulated in mature, bone‐forming osteoblasts, may play a significant role in limiting bone mineralization by inhibiting alkaline phosphatase expression. Extracellular adenosine triphosphate additionally exerts significant physicochemical (i.e., nonreceptor mediated) effects on mineralization via its hydrolysis product, pyrophosphate. The roles, if any, of P2Y receptors in osteocyte function are not well investigated, mainly because of the inaccessibility of these cells within bone. In osteoclasts, available evidence indicates that the P2Y 1 , P2Y 6 , and, possibly, P2Y 13 receptors could act to promote resorptive function. P2Y receptor‐mediated signaling has numerous and complex effects on bone cells; however, many of the key findings to date indicate that a large proportion of these actions may well be negative for bone. WIREs Membr Transp Signal 2012, 1:805–814. doi: 10.1002/wmts.67 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website .

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here