z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
L‐type Ca 2+ channels in heart and brain
Author(s) -
Striessnig Jörg,
Pinggera Alexandra,
Kaur Gurjot,
Bock Gabriella,
Tuluc Petronel
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
wiley interdisciplinary reviews: membrane transport and signaling
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2190-4618
pISSN - 2190-460X
DOI - 10.1002/wmts.102
Subject(s) - voltage dependent calcium channel , cav1.2 , calcium channel , gene isoform , l type calcium channel , n type calcium channel , t type calcium channel , neuroscience , calcium , function (biology) , protein subunit , gene , biology , gene knockout , chemistry , computational biology , microbiology and biotechnology , genetics , medicine
L‐type calcium channels (Cav1) represent one of the three major classes (Cav1–3) of voltage‐gated calcium channels. They were identified as the target of clinically used calcium channel blockers ( CCB s; so‐called calcium antagonists) and were the first class accessible to biochemical characterization. Four of the 10 known α1 subunits (Cav1.1–Cav1.4) form the pore of L‐type calcium channels ( LTCC s) and contain the high‐affinity drug‐binding sites for dihydropyridines and other chemical classes of organic CCB s. In essentially all electrically excitable cells one or more of these LTCC isoforms is expressed, and therefore it is not surprising that many body functions including muscle, brain, endocrine, and sensory function depend on proper LTCC activity. Gene knockouts and inherited human diseases have allowed detailed insight into the physiological and pathophysiological role of these channels. Genome‐wide association studies and analysis of human genomes are currently providing even more hints that even small changes of channel expression or activity may be associated with disease, such as psychiatric disease or cardiac arrhythmias. Therefore, it is important to understand the structure–function relationship of LTCC isoforms, their differential contribution to physiological function, as well as their fine‐tuning by modulatory cellular processes. WIREs Membr Transp Signal 2014,3:15–38. doi: 10.1002/wmts.102 Conflict of interest: The authors have declared no conflicts of interest for this article. For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website .

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here