z-logo
Premium
Scoring the Strengths and Weaknesses of Underage Drinking Laws in the United States
Author(s) -
Fell James C.,
Thomas Sue,
Scherer Michael,
Fisher Deborah A.,
Romano Eduardo
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
world medical and health policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.326
H-Index - 11
ISSN - 1948-4682
DOI - 10.1002/wmh3.132
Subject(s) - law , legislation , strengths and weaknesses , extant taxon , affect (linguistics) , coding (social sciences) , poison control , human factors and ergonomics , psychology , environmental health , social psychology , medicine , political science , mathematics , statistics , communication , evolutionary biology , biology
Several studies have examined the impact of a number of minimum legal drinking age 21 (MLDA‐21) laws on underage alcohol consumption and alcohol‐related crashes in the United States. These studies have contributed to our understanding of how alcohol control laws affect drinking and driving among those who are under age 21. However, much of the extant literature examining underage drinking laws uses a “Law/No law” coding, which may obscure the variability inherent in each law. Previous literature has demonstrated that inclusion of law strengths may affect outcomes and overall data fit when compared to “Law/No law” coding. In an effort to assess the relative strength of states' underage drinking legislation, a coding system was developed in 2006 and applied to 16 MLDA‐21 laws. The current article updates the previous endeavor and outlines a detailed strength coding mechanism for the current 20 MLDA‐21 laws.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here