Premium
Assessing human‐specific CrAssphage recovery after acidification‐filtration concentrating method in environmental water
Author(s) -
Petcharat Thitirat,
Kongprajug Akechai,
Chyerochatcha,
Sangkaew Watsawan,
Mongkolsuk Skorn,
Sirikanchana Kwanrawee
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
water environment research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.356
H-Index - 73
eISSN - 1554-7531
pISSN - 1061-4303
DOI - 10.1002/wer.1209
Subject(s) - effluent , seawater , environmental science , biology , pollution , wastewater , water quality , ecology , environmental engineering
Pinpointing water pollution sources using host‐specific gastrointestinal microbes, known as microbial source tracking (MST), have significant benefits for countries with water quality management issues related to pollution. A recently discovered bacteriophage, crAssphage, shows promise as a human‐specific MST marker. However, loss of genetic materials during the recovery and the detection processes could alter the ability to measure virus quantities in a water sample. This study determined the crAssphage recovery efficiencies in water sources, including seawater, freshwater, and influent and effluent from a wastewater treatment plant, by spiking natural crAssphage concentrates prior to DNA extraction and quantitative PCR analysis. The results showed that river and seawater with no or low crAssphage background experienced no recovery loss. Evaluating recovery efficiencies in samples with high crAssphage backgrounds posed a challenge due to the inability to prepare high crAssphage titers. This study highlights the importance of intra‐laboratory assessment of recovery efficiency in environmental samples for retrieving absolute crAssphage quantification with correction of bias among water samples and increase in data accuracy. Practitioner points In laboratory assessment of recovery efficiency is crucial for bias correction and data accuracy for absolute crAssphage quantification in water samples. No loss in crAssphage recovery was observed in river and seawater that contained no or low crAssphage backgrounds. Inability to prepare high crAssphage spike concentrations remains the major limitation for evaluating recovery in samples with high crAssphage backgrounds. The results underline the importance of evaluating method recovery in real environmental samples that reflect actual matrix effect. Absolute crAssphage quantification, as human‐specific pollution marker, could be used for prioritizing water quality restoration and area‐based management plan.