Open AccessIncrease in the annual energy production due to a retrofit of vortex generators on blades
Author(s) -
Skrzypiński Witold,
Gaunaa Mac,
Bak Christian,
Junker Birgit,
Brønnum Niels Bruhn,
Kruse Emil Krog
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
wind energy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.743
H-Index - 92
eISSN - 1099-1824
pISSN - 1095-4244
DOI - 10.1002/we.2446
Subject(s) - retrofitting , turbine blade , turbine , work (physics) , surface roughness , environmental science , engineering , marine engineering , automotive engineering , mechanical engineering , structural engineering , materials science , composite material
Abstract The aim of the current work was to analyze the effect of retrofitting vortex generators (VGs) on the blades of a constant RPM, pitch‐regulated, megawatt‐sized turbine suffering from surface roughness. Engineering modelling and experimental work were utilized, indicating that the degradation of energy production may be mitigated by the VGs. The modelling results indicated that the optimal configuration of VGs to maximize the annual energy production (AEP) depends on the degree of severity of surface roughness. Depending on blade surface condition and turbine characteristics, installation of VGs on an incorrect blade span or installation of too large VGs too far out on the blade may cause loss in the AEP. Therefore, engineering modelling is necessary before VGs may be retrofitted on a specific turbine. The modelling results indicated that the worse blade surface, the more gain may be obtained from the VGs. The work included a full‐scale experimental validation of the present engineering model, lasting 27 months and comprising six turbines where VGs were mounted on three, each with a neighboring turbine as a reference. The turbines were analyzed in pairs, and the influence of the VGs was judged upon the relative difference in energy production before and after the installation. The reason was to limit measurement uncertainty. The results showed that all three turbines increased their energy production after the installation. Results from the three pairs showed an average increase in the energy production of 3.3%, being satisfactorily close to the average 2.8% predicted by the present engineering tool.