z-logo
Premium
Cognitive processing, language typology, and variation
Author(s) -
Sinnemäki Kaius
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
wiley interdisciplinary reviews: cognitive science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.526
H-Index - 49
eISSN - 1939-5086
pISSN - 1939-5078
DOI - 10.1002/wcs.1294
Subject(s) - typology , cognition , variation (astronomy) , linguistic typology , cognitive psychology , problem of universals , linguistics , parallels , diversity (politics) , multidisciplinary approach , psychology , cognitive science , categorization , computer science , sociology , artificial intelligence , social science , engineering , mechanical engineering , philosophy , physics , neuroscience , astrophysics , anthropology
Linguistic typological preferences have often been linked to cognitive processing preferences but often without recourse to typologically relevant experiments on cognitive processing. This article reviews experimental work on the possible parallels between preferences in cognitive processing and language typology. I summarize the main theoretical accounts of the processing‐typology connection and show that typological distributions arise diachronically from preferred paths of language change, which may be affected by the degree to which alternative structures are preferred (e.g., easier) in acquisition or usage. The surveyed experimental evidence shows that considerable support exists for many linguistic universals to reflect preferences in cognitive processing. Artificial language learning experiments emerge as a promising method for researching the processing‐typology connection, as long as its limitations are taken into account. I further show that social and cultural differences in cognition may have an effect on typological distributions and that to account for this variation a multidisciplinary approach to the processing‐typology connection has to be developed. Lastly, since the body of experimental research does not adequately represent the linguistic diversity of the world's languages, it remains as an urgent task for the field to better account for this diversity in future work. WIREs Cogn Sci 2014, 5:477‐487. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1294 This article is categorized under: Linguistics > Linguistic Theory Psychology > Language

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here