Premium
The social brain and reward: social information processing in the human striatum
Author(s) -
Bhanji Jamil P.,
Delgado Mauricio R.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
wiley interdisciplinary reviews: cognitive science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.526
H-Index - 49
eISSN - 1939-5086
pISSN - 1939-5078
DOI - 10.1002/wcs.1266
Subject(s) - psychology , praise , social learning , ventral striatum , value (mathematics) , social competence , social neuroscience , cognitive psychology , neural correlates of consciousness , perspective (graphical) , social cognition , social relation , social heuristics , striatum , social psychology , social change , neuroscience , cognition , artificial intelligence , political science , computer science , pedagogy , machine learning , dopamine , law
In the highly social life of humans, rewards that are sought and experienced are intertwined with social relationships and interactions between people. Just as we value nonsocial rewards such as food or money, we also value social outcomes (e.g., praise from a superior). We use social information to evaluate and form expectations of others and to make decisions involving others. Here we review research demonstrating how the neural circuitry of reward, particularly the striatum, is also involved in processing social information and making decisions in social situations. This research provides an understanding of the neural basis for social behavior from the perspective of how we evaluate social experiences and how our social interactions and decisions are motivated. We review research addressing the common neural systems underlying evaluation of social and nonsocial rewards. The human striatum, known to play a key role in reward processing, displays signals related to a broad spectrum of social functioning, including evaluating social rewards, making decisions influenced by social factors, learning about social others, cooperating, competing, and following social norms. WIREs Cogn Sci 2014, 5:61–73. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1266 This article is categorized under: Neuroscience > Cognition