Premium
Climate change and loss, as if people mattered: values, places, and experiences
Author(s) -
Tschakert Petra,
Barnett Jon,
Ellis Neville,
Lawrence Carmen,
Tuancy,
New Mark,
ElrickBarr Carmen,
Pandit Ram,
Pannell David
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
wiley interdisciplinary reviews: climate change
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.678
H-Index - 75
eISSN - 1757-7799
pISSN - 1757-7780
DOI - 10.1002/wcc.476
Subject(s) - framing (construction) , climate change , united nations framework convention on climate change , scholarship , environmental ethics , embodied cognition , valuation (finance) , convention , value (mathematics) , sociology , political science , social science , geography , epistemology , ecology , economics , law , kyoto protocol , philosophy , archaeology , finance , machine learning , computer science , biology
The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change ( UNFCCC ) is seeking to prepare for losses arising from climate change. This is an emerging issue that challenges climate science and policy to engage more deeply with values, places, and people's experiences. We first provide insight into the UNFCCC framing of loss and damage and current approaches to valuation. We then draw on the growing literature on value‐ and place‐based approaches to adaptation, including limits to adaptation, which examines loss as nuanced and sensitive to the nature of people's lives. Complementary perspectives from human geography, psychology, philosophy, economics, and ecology underscore the importance of understanding what matters to people and what they may likely consider to constitute loss. A significant body of knowledge illustrates that loss is often given meaning through lived, embodied, and place‐based experiences, and so is more felt than tangible. We end with insights into recent scholarship that addresses how people make trade‐offs between different value priorities. This emerging literature offers an opening in the academic debate to further advance a relational framing of loss in which trade‐offs between lived values are seen as dynamic elements in a prospective loss space. WIREs Clim Change 2017, 8:e476. doi: 10.1002/wcc.476 This article is categorized under: Climate, Nature, and Ethics > Comparative Environmental Values