z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Combining visible near‐infrared spectroscopy and water vapor sorption for soil specific surface area estimation
Author(s) -
Knadel Maria,
Jonge Lis Wollesen,
Tuller Markus,
Rehman Hafeez Ur,
Jensen Peter Weber,
Moldrup Per,
Greve Mogens H.,
Arthur Emmanuel
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
vadose zone journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.036
H-Index - 81
ISSN - 1539-1663
DOI - 10.1002/vzj2.20007
Subject(s) - sorption , partial least squares regression , mean squared error , cross validation , chemistry , analytical chemistry (journal) , soil science , mathematics , environmental science , environmental chemistry , statistics , adsorption , organic chemistry
The soil specific surface area (SSA) is a fundamental property governing a range of soil processes relevant to engineering, environmental, and agricultural applications. A method for SSA determination based on a combination of visible near‐infrared spectroscopy (vis‐NIRS) and vapor sorption isotherm measurements was proposed. Two models for water vapor sorption isotherms (WSIs) were used: the Tuller–Or (TO) and the Guggenheim–Anderson–de Boer (GAB) model. They were parameterized with sorption isotherm measurements and applied for SSA estimation for a wide range of soils ( N  = 270) from 27 countries. The generated vis‐NIRS models were compared with models where the SSA was determined with the ethylene glycol monoethyl ether (EGME) method. Different regression techniques were tested and included partial least squares (PLS), support vector machines (SVM), and artificial neural networks (ANN). The effect of dataset subdivision based on EGME values on model performance was also tested. Successful calibration models for SSA TO and SSA GAB were generated and were nearly identical to that of SSA EGME . The performance of models was dependent on the range and variation in SSA values. However, the comparison using selected validation samples indicated no significant differences in the estimated SSA TO , SSA GAB , and SSA EGME , with an average standardized RMSE (SRMSE = RMSE/range) of 0.07, 0.06 and 0.07, respectively. Small differences among the regression techniques were found, yet SVM performed best. The results of this study indicate that the combination of vis‐NIRS with the WSI as a reference technique for vis‐NIRS models provides SSA estimations akin to the EGME method.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here