z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Characterizing soil piping networks in loess‐derived soils using ground‐penetrating radar
Author(s) -
Got J.B.,
Bielders C. L.,
Lambot S.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
vadose zone journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.036
H-Index - 81
ISSN - 1539-1663
DOI - 10.1002/vzj2.20006
Subject(s) - ground penetrating radar , piping , loess , geology , soil water , context (archaeology) , remote sensing , radar , hydrology (agriculture) , soil science , environmental science , geotechnical engineering , geomorphology , engineering , environmental engineering , telecommunications , paleontology
Soil piping remains a relatively unexplored phenomenon despite its substantial impacts on water and sediment transfer at the watershed scale at numerous locations around the world. One of the main limitations regarding the study of this singular process is the characterization of the pipe networks (in terms of number, position, dimensions, and connectivity of pipes). In this context, noninvasive subsurface imaging using ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) has proven to be a promising technique. This study used two three‐dimensional (3D), high‐resolution GPR surveys performed in loess‐derived soils to characterize small pipe networks with little prior information about their location. The adopted methodology relies on high spatial resolution scanning, 3D subsurface imaging, and automated detection of reflection hyperbolas using a 200‐MHz center‐frequency antenna. Two small watersheds affected by piping were investigated at Sippenaeken and Kluisbergen (Belgium). Over the two scanned zones, results revealed significant subsurface continuous patterns. Even though the most obvious patterns corresponded to recent or past anthropic activities (e.g., artificial drainage pipes), validation tests confirmed that the chosen methodology can be used for pipe network characterization because some important continuity patterns were related to soil piping: for instance, a fairly small pipe (approximately 10–15 cm in diameter) was detected and validated for more than 100 m. Nevertheless, the high variability in size, depth, and orientation of the pipes imply that GPR may only be truly efficient when using very high spatial resolution scanning, which limits its application to specific conditions not always met in piped areas.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here