Premium
Evidence of a sudden increase in α‐chloralose poisoning in dogs and cats in the Netherlands between 2018 and 2021
Author(s) -
Dijkman Marieke A.,
Robben Joris H.,
Riel Antoinette J. H. P.,
Lange Dylan W.
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
veterinary record
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.261
H-Index - 99
eISSN - 2042-7670
pISSN - 0042-4900
DOI - 10.1002/vetr.2342
Subject(s) - chloralose , cats , medicine , toxicology , biology
Background After changes in European Union biocide legislation, the Dutch Poisons Information Center observed a strong increase in information requests concerning dogs and cats exposed to α‐chloralose. To investigate whether α‐chloralose‐based rodenticides are safe for non‐professional use, additional information regarding poisoning scenarios and clinical course was collected. Methods Veterinarians reporting α‐chloralose exposure over a 2.5‐year period were contacted by mail for follow‐up information concerning exposure scenario, product formulation, clinical course and treatment, and outcome. In total, information was collected for 96 dogs and 41 cats. Results Fifty‐three of 96 dogs and 17 of 19 cats known to have been exposed to α‐chloralose‐based rodenticides developed signs of central nervous system (CNS) depression or sensory‐induced CNS excitation. Mortality in dogs and cats following exposure was 1% and 18%, respectively. An additional 22 cats presented with clinical signs suggestive of α‐chloralose poisoning, with a mortality of 5%. Limitations Exposure to α‐chloralose was not confirmed by biochemical analyses. Conclusion Dogs and especially cats were at risk of poisoning from α‐chloralose. If criteria such as acute toxicity and risk of (secondary) poisoning are applied during the approval of α‐chloralose‐based rodenticides, similar to anticoagulant‐based rodenticides, it can be concluded that α‐chloralose is also not safe for non‐professional use.