Premium
Why do veterinarians leave clinical practice? A qualitative study using thematic analysis
Author(s) -
Arbe Montoya Alejandra I.,
Hazel Susan J.,
Matthew Susan M.,
McArthur Michelle L.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
veterinary record
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.261
H-Index - 99
eISSN - 2042-7670
pISSN - 0042-4900
DOI - 10.1002/vetr.2
Subject(s) - thematic analysis , workforce , remuneration , medicine , mental health , qualitative research , nursing , attrition , family medicine , medical education , psychiatry , social science , dentistry , finance , sociology , economics , economic growth
Background : Veterinarians have an important role in society and having an adequate veterinary workforce is important not only for their communities but also nationwide. Lately, there have been anecdotal reports regarding veterinary practices struggling to find clinicians as well as evidence of mental ill‐health in veterinarians. Furthermore, the Australian Veterinary Association annual workforce survey shows an increased percentage of veterinarians intending to leave practice from 2017 to 2019. Although many factors for attrition have been described in other professions, reasons for veterinarians to leave practice are not well understood. Methods : This study investigated why veterinary clinicians leave clinical practice by using Thematic Analysis to analyse 26 semi‐structured interviews of former veterinary clinicians in relation to their work experiences and reasons for leaving. Interviews were done from February–April 2018 either face to face, via teleconferencing, or telephone. Participants were recruited from each Australian state except for New South Wales. Results : The results showed that a combination of personal and work‐related factors influenced the participants to leave clinical practice. In Personal Factors, participants described the internal and external circumstances that impacted on their personal lives such as personal relationships, experiencing negative thoughts and emotions, physical and mental health, core motivations and beliefs, alternative professional and personal interests. On the other hand, Work Experiences described situations, experiences, and statements directly related to the participant's veterinary clinical work such as workplace relationships, employment conditions including remuneration and working hours and clinical experiences such as negative clinical outcomes. Furthermore, interlinkages between these two themes were revealed in participants’ responses. Conclusion : This study highlights factors that contribute to attrition from veterinary clinical practice. The narrative indicates that the interlinking of such factors influenced the decision‐making process to leave clinical practice in this cohort of former veterinary clinicians. Further research is required to understand the full implications for veterinary clinical practice and inform intervention strategies for retention.