Premium
Antenatal ultrasound prediction of pulmonary hypoplasia in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: correlation with pathology
Author(s) -
Jani J. C.,
Cordier A.G.,
Martinovic J.,
Peralta C. F.,
Senat M.V.,
Segers V.,
Benachi A.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.202
H-Index - 141
eISSN - 1469-0705
pISSN - 0960-7692
DOI - 10.1002/uog.9031
Subject(s) - medicine , congenital diaphragmatic hernia , pulmonary hypoplasia , gestational age , fetus , diaphragmatic breathing , lung , hypoplasia , diaphragmatic hernia , ultrasound , hernia , birth weight , cardiology , pregnancy , anatomy , nuclear medicine , obstetrics , radiology , pathology , genetics , alternative medicine , biology
Abstract Objective To examine the relationship between observed to expected (o/e) lung to head circumference ratio (LHR) and lung‐to‐body weight ratio (LBWR) in fetuses with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). Methods All consecutive fetuses with CDH and termination of pregnancy for which a postmortem examination was available, examined at three institutions between 2000 and 2010, were included in the study. Contralateral fetal lung area was measured by two‐dimensional ultrasonography using the longest axis method and the o/e‐LHR was calculated based on the appropriate normal mean for gestational age (GA). Regression analysis was used to determine the significance of association between the LBWR and the o/e‐LHR for left and right‐sided cases, and subsequently the predicted LBWR in left‐sided CDH was calculated using the regression equation. Regression analysis was used to investigate the effect on the proportional difference between the predicted and observed LBWR of GA at o/e‐LHR, time gap between o/e‐LHR and LBWR measurement, proportional weight of the ipsilateral compared with total lung weight, presence of associated anomalies and intrathoracic herniation of the liver. Results There were 23 fetuses with left‐sided and seven fetuses with right‐sided CDH. In left‐sided CDH, the LBWR and the o/e‐LHR correlated significantly, following the linear equation: LBWR = 0.0043 + (0.0134 × o/e‐LHR ) ( r = 0.52, P = 0.012), but this was not the case for right‐sided CDH, for which LBWR followed the equation: LBWR = 0.0107 − (0.0014 × o/e‐LHR ) ( r = 0.08, P = 0.862), where o/e‐LHR is expressed as percentage. Regression analysis showed that the proportional difference between predicted and observed LBWR in left‐sided CDH was significantly and independently associated with GA at o/e‐LHR measurement and proportional weight of ipsilateral vs. total lung weight. Conclusion In left‐sided CDH, o/e‐LHR correlates well with LBWR irrespective of the length of time between o/e‐LHR and LBWR measurement, presence of associated anomalies and intrathoracic herniation of the liver. Inconsistencies between the two measurements are mainly attributable to the contribution of the ipsilateral lung to the total lung weight. In right‐sided CDH, o/e‐LHR does not correlate with LBWR. Copyright © 2011 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.