Premium
Validation of three‐dimensional perineal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging measurements of the pubovisceral muscle at rest
Author(s) -
Majida M.,
BrÆkken I. H.,
Bø K.,
Šaltytė Benth J.,
Engh M. E.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.202
H-Index - 141
eISSN - 1469-0705
pISSN - 0960-7692
DOI - 10.1002/uog.7587
Subject(s) - medicine , supine position , ultrasound , pelvic floor , magnetic resonance imaging , perineum , urethra , anatomy , 3d ultrasound , vagina , nuclear medicine , radiology , surgery
Objective To compare biometric measurements of the pubovisceral muscle during rest, measured using transperineal three‐dimensional (3D) ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods In this prospective study, 18 female volunteers underwent 3D perineal ultrasound examination and MRI. All women were examined at rest in the supine position and the following measurements were taken: area and anteroposterior and transverse diameters of the levator hiatus; thickness of the pubovisceral muscle, measured lateral to the vagina and to the rectum, on the right and left sides; length of the levator–urethra gap (LUG), measured from the center of the urethra to the insertion of the pubovisceral muscle on the pubic bone. Interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) between the measurements obtained with 3D ultrasound and with MRI were calculated. To quantify the intermeasurement agreement, the bias and SDs were calculated, and limits of agreement constructed. One investigator performed all the analyses. Results There was no significant difference between the mean values of the measurements by 3D perineal ultrasound and those by MRI. The ICC values showed very good agreement (range, 0.80–0.97). There was a significant positive bias for LUG on the left side and muscle thickness on the right side of the vagina. Conclusion These results suggest that 3D ultrasound could be used instead of MRI when evaluating static pelvic floor anatomy in women without pelvic organ prolapse at rest. Copyright © 2010 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.