Premium
Three‐dimensional sonographic calculation of the volume of intracranial structures in growth‐restricted and appropriate‐for‐gestational age fetuses
Author(s) -
BenavidesSerralde A.,
HernándezAndrade E.,
FernándezDelgado J.,
Plasencia W.,
Scheier M.,
Crispi F.,
Figueras F.,
Nicolaides K. H.,
Gratacós E.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.202
H-Index - 141
eISSN - 1469-0705
pISSN - 0960-7692
DOI - 10.1002/uog.6343
Subject(s) - medicine , fetus , gestational age , ultrasound , 3d ultrasound , nuclear medicine , gestation , intraclass correlation , volume (thermodynamics) , anatomy , obstetrics , pregnancy , radiology , clinical psychology , psychometrics , genetics , physics , quantum mechanics , biology
Objectives To evaluate the feasibility and reproducibility of volume segmentation of fetal intracranial structures using three‐dimensional (3D) ultrasound imaging, and to estimate differences in the volume of intracranial structures between intrauterine growth‐restricted (IUGR) and appropriate‐for‐gestational age (AGA) fetuses. Methods Total intracranial, frontal, thalamic and cerebellar volumes were measured using 3D ultrasound imaging and Virtual Organ Computer‐aided AnaLysis (VOCAL) in 39 IUGR and 39 AGA fetuses matched for gestational age, at 28–34 weeks of gestation. Volumes of, and ratios between, structures were estimated, and differences between IUGR and AGA fetuses were calculated. Volume measurements were performed by two observers, and interobserver and intraobserver intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for each structure. Results Volumes were satisfactorily obtained in all fetuses. All net volumes except those for the thalamus ( P = 0.23) were significantly smaller ( P = 0.001) in IUGR fetuses. After adjusting volumes for biparietal diameter the frontal volume was significantly smaller ( P = 0.02) and the thalamic volume significantly greater ( P = 0.03) in IUGR fetuses than in AGA fetuses. Significant intergroup differences in the ratios between structures were found only in those involving the frontal region. Interobserver ICCs were as follows: total intracranial 0.97 (95% CI, 0.92–0.98), cerebellar 0.69 (95% CI, 0.44–0.75), frontal 0.66 (95% CI, 0.42–0.79) and thalamic 0.54 (95% CI, 0.37–0.72). Conclusions IUGR fetuses show differences in the volume of intracranial structures compared with AGA fetuses, with the largest difference found in the frontal region. These differences might be explained by in‐utero processes of neural reorganization induced by chronic hypoxia. Copyright © 2009 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.