Premium
Volumetric (3D) imaging reduces inter‐ and intraobserver variation of fetal biometry measurements
Author(s) -
Chan L. W.,
Fung T. Y.,
Leung T. Y.,
Sahota D. S.,
Lau T. K.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.202
H-Index - 141
eISSN - 1469-0705
pISSN - 0960-7692
DOI - 10.1002/uog.6321
Subject(s) - medicine , 3d ultrasound , ultrasound , nuclear medicine , biparietal diameter , limits of agreement , ultrasound imaging , coefficient of variation , circumference , ultrasonography , head circumference , radiology , gestational age , pregnancy , mathematics , statistics , genetics , geometry , biology
Objective To compare the inter‐ and intraobserver variation of fetal biometric measurements utilizing two‐dimensional (2D) and three‐dimensional (3D) ultrasound imaging. Methods This prospective study, utilizing three pairs of doctors trained in sonography, evaluated singleton pregnancies in the mid‐trimester. Measurements of the biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL) were taken in duplicate by each doctor using 2D imaging and then again using 3D volume datasets. Each set of paired doctors evaluated 12 patients. Inter‐ and intraobserver variation were calculated as the SD of the difference between paired measurements performed by the doctor pairs and by the individual doctors, respectively. Bland–Altman plots were used to visually compare measurement bias and agreement by 2D and 3D methods. Results Inter‐ and intraobserver variation for 2D and 3D ultrasound were small. The intraobserver variation of HC, AC and FL was significantly lower for 3D compared with 2D ultrasound. Interobserver variation was not significantly different when measured with 2D and 3D ultrasound, with the exception of FL, which was lower when measured with 3D ultrasound. The Bland–Altman plots showed that in 95% of the measurements, the percentage difference between 2D and 3D ultrasound techniques was within 5.3%, 4.6%, 9.6% and 9.6% for BPD, HC, AC and FL, respectively. Conclusions 2D and 3D fetal biometric measurements are reproducible. The use of 3D ultrasound significantly reduces intraobserver variation for HC, AC and FL and reduces interobserver variation for FL. Copyright © 2009 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.