z-logo
Premium
Transperineal three‐dimensional ultrasound in evaluating anal sphincter muscles
Author(s) -
Lee J. H.,
Pretorius D. H.,
Weinstein M.,
Guaderrama N. M.,
Nager C. W.,
Mittal R. K.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.202
H-Index - 141
eISSN - 1469-0705
pISSN - 0960-7692
DOI - 10.1002/uog.4057
Subject(s) - medicine , external anal sphincter , anatomy , internal anal sphincter , anal canal , anus , rest (music) , urethral sphincter , anal sphincter , echogenicity , sphincter , ultrasound , levator ani , fecal incontinence , ultrasonography , rectum , nuclear medicine , surgery , pelvic floor , radiology , urethra
Objectives To evaluate whether transperineal three‐dimensional (3D) ultrasound can be used to depict normal anal sphincter anatomy and to measure the thickness of muscle layers and the anteroposterior length of the levator hiatus. Methods The study included 22 normal nulliparous female volunteers. Transperineal 3D sonographic evaluation of the anal canal included assessment of sphincter shape, echogenicity, marginal definition and muscle thickness. Measurements of the thickness of the internal anal sphincter (IAS) and puborectalis muscle (PRM) were determined with the women at rest and during squeezing by two observers, and interobserver reliability was determined. The anteroposterior length of the levator hiatus at rest and during squeezing was measured. Results The proximal end of the anal canal (towards the rectum) consisted of overlapping IAS and PRM, and the distal end (towards the anus) consisted of overlapping IAS and external anal sphincter (EAS). At the PRM level, the mean ± SD IAS thickness was 2.3 ± 0.5 mm at rest and 2.5 ± 0.4 mm during squeezing, and at the mid‐EAS level it was 2.9 ± 0.5 mm at rest and 2.8 ± 0.5 mm during squeezing. The PRM thickness was 6.5 ± 1.0 mm at rest and 6.4 ± 1.2 mm during squeezing. The difference in muscle thickness of the sphincter layers with the woman at rest and during squeezing was not significant. The anteroposterior length of the levator hiatus was 51.7 ± 5.0 mm at rest and 47.4 ± 4.1 mm during squeezing ( P < 0.01). Conclusion Transperineal 3D ultrasound may be useful in evaluating the anatomy of the anal canal. Copyright © 2007 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here