Premium
Subtelomeric rearrangements and 22q11.2 deletion syndrome in anomalous growth‐restricted fetuses with normal or balanced G‐banded karyotype
Author(s) -
Chen M.,
Hwu W.L.,
Kuo S.J.,
Chen C.P.,
Yin P.L.,
Chang S.P.,
Lee D.J.,
Chen T.H.,
Wang B.T.,
Lin C.C.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.202
H-Index - 141
eISSN - 1469-0705
pISSN - 0960-7692
DOI - 10.1002/uog.3884
Subject(s) - subtelomere , monosomy , karyotype , fluorescence in situ hybridization , fetus , genetics , biology , chromosome , prenatal diagnosis , autosome , medicine , pregnancy , gene
Objective To determine the frequencies of cryptic subtelomeric rearrangements and 22q11.2 deletion in anomalous growth‐restricted fetuses with normal or balanced G‐banded karyotypes. Methods This was a study of 27 consecutive fetuses at a median gestational age of 26 (range, 19–33) weeks, that had intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) as well as at least one major structural anomaly, and a normal or balanced G‐banded karyotype. The median maternal age was 29 (range, 17–39) years. Fluorescence z in‐situ hybridization (FISH) diagnosis of the cultured amniocytes with the probe TUPLE 1, and then the Chromoprobe Multiprobe‐T® system were used, respectively, to screen for the frequency of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome and subtelomeric rearrangements involving the 41 unique chromosome ends (i.e. excluding the five short arms of acrocentric autosomes (no. 13, 14, 15, 21 and 22)). Those that had suspected deleted subtelomeres were reanalyzed with a specific subtelomeric probe, TelVysion ® . Results Of the 27 fetuses, three (11%) were affected with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome and two (7.4%) had subtelomeric deletions (one monosomy 21q22.3, one monosomy 1p36.3). Of the 11 fetuses with congenital heart defects, three (27.3%) had 22q11.2 deletion syndrome and one (9.1%) had monosomy 1p36.3. In the remaining 16 fetuses without congenital heart defects, none had 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. However, one (6.3%) had cryptic rearrangement involving subtelomeres. Conclusion Prenatal subtelomeric FISH screening is technically feasible using cultured amniocytes. We propose that 22q11.2 deletion syndrome and cryptic subtelomere rearrangements may be important etiologies of fetuses with IUGR and at least one structural anomaly, along with a normal karyotype or one that is balanced by traditional G‐banding. Fetuses with congenital heart defects and IUGR should undergo FISH to exclude 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. In fetuses with IUGR and at least one major structural anomaly but without congenital heart defects, screening of subtelomeric rearrangements may contribute to further elucidation of the underlying etiology. Copyright © 2006 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.