z-logo
Premium
First‐trimester and combined first‐ and second‐trimester prediction of small‐for‐gestational age and late fetal growth restriction
Author(s) -
Sotiriadis A.,
Figueras F.,
Eleftheriades M.,
Papaioannou G. K.,
Chorozoglou G.,
Dinas K.,
Papantoniou N.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.202
H-Index - 141
eISSN - 1469-0705
pISSN - 0960-7692
DOI - 10.1002/uog.19055
Subject(s) - medicine , obstetrics , fetus , gestational age , pregnancy , gestation , logistic regression , small for gestational age , birth weight , intrauterine growth restriction , genetics , biology
Objective To develop a first‐trimester or combined first‐ and second‐trimester screening algorithm for the prediction of small‐for‐gestational age (SGA) and late fetal growth restriction (FGR). Methods This was a retrospective study of women with singleton pregnancy, who underwent routine first‐, second‐ and third‐trimester ultrasound assessment. Late FGR was defined, at ≥ 32 weeks' gestation in the absence of congenital anomalies, as either (i) estimated fetal weight (EFW) or birth weight (BW) < 3 rd centile, or (ii) EFW < 10 th centile and either uterine artery mean pulsatility index (UtA‐PI) > 95 th centile or cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) < 5 th centile. Neonates with BW < 10 th centile, regardless of prenatal parameters, were defined as SGA. The predictive effectiveness of maternal and first‐ and second‐trimester factors was tested using logistic regression and receiver–operating characteristics curve analyses. Results A total of 3520 fetuses were included (late FGR, n  = 109 (3.1%); SGA, n  = 292 (8.3%)). Of the late FGR cases, 56 (1.6%) fulfilled the antenatal criteria (EFW < 3 rd centile or EFW < 10 th centile plus abnormal UtA‐PI or CPR) and were defined as prenatally detected late FGR. A first‐trimester screening model (comprising conception method, smoking status, maternal height, pregnancy‐associated plasma protein‐A (PAPP‐A) and UtA‐PI) could predict 50.0% of the prenatally diagnosed and 36.7% of the overall late FGR fetuses for a 10% false‐positive rate (FPR). A model combining first‐ and second‐trimester screening parameters (conception method, smoking status, PAPP‐A, second‐ trimester EFW, head circumference/abdominal circumference ratio and UtA‐PI) could predict 78.6% of the prenatally detected, and 59.6% of the overall late FGR fetuses, for a 10% FPR (area under the curve 0.901 (95% CI, 0.856–0.947) and 0.855 (95% CI, 0.818–0.891), respectively). The prediction of SGA was suboptimal for both first‐trimester and combined screening. Conclusions A simple model combining maternal and first‐ and second‐trimester predictors can detect 60% of fetuses that will develop late FGR, and 79% of those fetuses that will be classified prenatally as late FGR, for a 10% FPR. Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom