Premium
Prenatal diagnosis of pericallosal curvilinear lipoma: specific imaging pattern and diagnostic pitfalls
Author(s) -
Atallah A.,
Lacalm A.,
Massoud M.,
Massardier J.,
Gaucherand P.,
Guibaud L.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.202
H-Index - 141
eISSN - 1469-0705
pISSN - 0960-7692
DOI - 10.1002/uog.17400
Subject(s) - medicine , corpus callosum , dysgenesis , magnetic resonance imaging , hyperintensity , radiology , prenatal diagnosis , ultrasound , fetus , anatomy , pregnancy , genetics , biology
We report the first series of cases of pericallosal curvilinear lipoma (CL) diagnosed prenatally and highlight the limitations in identifying a specific prenatal imaging pattern using ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In all five of our cases, on ultrasound, the main feature leading to referral was a short corpus callosum. This subtle callosal dysgenesis was associated with a band of hyperechogenicity surrounding the corpus callosum, mimicking the pericallosal sulcus, which increased in size during the third trimester in three of the four cases in which sonographic follow‐up was performed. On T2‐weighted MRI, this band showed typical hypointensity in all cases; in contrast, on T1‐weighted imaging, in only one case was there hyperintensity, suggestive of fat, as seen typically in the postnatal period. For appropriate prenatal counseling regarding outcome, it is important to identify or rule out CL when mild corpus callosal dysgenesis is observed. One should be aware of subtle diagnostic findings, such as a thin band of echogenicity surrounding the corpus callosum that is seen as a band of hypointensity on T2‐weighted fetal MRI, and which may increase in size during gestation. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.