z-logo
Premium
Re: Prediction of microcephaly at birth using three reference ranges for fetal head circumference: can we improve prenatal diagnosis? Z. Leibovitz, E. Daniel‐Spiegel, G. Malinger, K. Haratz, M. Tamarkin, L. Gindes, L. Schreiber, L. Ben‐Sira, D. Lev, I. Shapiro, H. Bakry, B. Weizman, A. Zreik, S. Egenburg, A. Arad, R. Tepper, D. Kidron and T. Lerman‐Sagie. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 47: 586–592.
Author(s) -
Deter R. L.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.202
H-Index - 141
eISSN - 1469-0705
pISSN - 0960-7692
DOI - 10.1002/uog.15911
Subject(s) - microcephaly , medicine , prenatal diagnosis , head circumference , fetus , pregnancy , obstetrics , pediatrics , gestational age , incidence (geometry) , genetics , biology , physics , optics
Linked Comment: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 47: 586–592

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here